My Challenges (timed)


See my list here
Completed 8 of 9



See my list here
Completed 2 of 3



See my list here
Completed 2 of 4



See my list here
Completed 71 of 81



See my list here
Completed 9 of 10


See my list here
Completed 34 of 50



See my list here
Completed 1 of 2



See my list here
Completed 1 of 2



See my list here
Completed 1 of 5



See my list here
Completed 3 of 5



See my list here
Completed 5 of 100

My Challenges (perpetual)

100 SHOTS OF SHORT
See my list of stories read here

CHECKIN’ OFF THE CHEKHOV
See my list of stories read here

THE COMPLETE BOOKER
See my list of books read here

MARTEL-HARPER CHALLENGE
See my list of books read here

MODERN LIBRARY'S 100 BEST NOVELS

See my list of books read here

NATIONAL BOOK AWARDS
See my list of books read here

THE PULITZER PROJECT
See my list of books read here

TAMMY'S BEYOND BOOKS CHALLENGE

New York Times Book Review: 6/40
New Yorker: 0/36
New York Review of Books: 0/20
Vogue: 1/16
Email: 841/1373

Saturday, May 17, 2008

A Confederacy of Dunces by Robert Kennedy Toole

Synopsis from Barnes & Noble:

"The best-selling, Pulitzer Prize-winning classic hailed by The New York Times Book Review as "a masterwork . . . the novel astonishes with its inventiveness . . . it is nothing less than a grand comic fugue." A Confederacy of Dunces is an American comic masterpiece. John Kennedy Toole's hero, one Ignatius J. Reilly, is "huge, obese, fractious, fastidious, a latter-day Gargantua, a Don Quixote of the French Quarter. His story bursts with wholly original characters, denizens of New Orleans' lower depths, incredibly true-to-life dialogue, and the zaniest series of high and low comic adventures" (Henry Kisor, Chicago Sun-Times)."

It's difficult for me to know what to write about this book. I enjoyed it and found myself not wanting to put it down because I had to know what was going to happen next. The writing style was good, it moved quickly and I didn't get bogged down at all. That said, I didn't find the book as funny as I've always read and heard that it is -- there were numerous times when I found myself smirking at something or thinking, "That was clever," but only 1 or 2 times I actually laughed. I guess my main difficulty is in reconciling how this book is considered one of the "great books of the 20th century." I read somewhere that the author has been compared to Jonathan Swift ("Gulliver's Travels") but I don't get it. I'd really like to know if I'm just missing something or if this book has an undeserved reputation. I'm going to do some research and see if I can get a better grip on it. But like I said, I enjoyed it. I would read it again and I have no problem recommending it to others -- I just question how others have categorized it.

0 comments: